Ценовые искажения, вмешательство государства и ценообразование на финансовых рынках тема диссертации и автореферата по ВАК РФ 00.00.00, кандидат наук Ринкон Эрнандес Карлос Хоакин
- Специальность ВАК РФ00.00.00
- Количество страниц 394
Оглавление диссертации кандидат наук Ринкон Эрнандес Карлос Хоакин
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1. GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONS AND THE FINANCIAL
MARKETS
The Federal Reserve and Unconventional Monetary Policy
Operation Twist
COVID QE
The Swiss National Bank and Foreign Exchange Policy
CHAPTER 2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: THE STATE OF THE ART
Complex Dynamics of Government Interventions: Monetary Policy Impact on Asset
Prices and Financial Markets
Monetary Policy Impact on Global Financial Markets
Other Forms of Government Interventions and their Effects on other Financial Assets
CHAPTER 3. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The Money Market and Foreign Exchange Market clearing
The Link Between the Money Market and the Stock Market
The Price Distortions
CHAPTER 4. THE METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
The Data: The U.S. Financial Markets
The Data: The E.U. Financial Markets
The Data: The Swiss Financial Markets
Empirical Model: the Fed Case
Empirical Model: the ECB Case
Empirical Model: the Swiss Case
CHAPTER 5. EMPIRICAL RESULTS
5.1. ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF FEDERAL RESERVE POLICIES ON EQUITY MARKET VALUATIONS: AN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES APPROACH
Introduction
The Data and Methods
Empirical Results
Discussion
Implications
Conclusions for the section
5.2. EQUITY MARKETS PRICING AND CENTRAL BANK INTERVENTIONS: A PANEL DATA APPROACH
Introduction
The Data and Methods
Results and Discussion
Implications
Conclusions for the section
5.3. MONETARY INTERVENTIONS, EQUITY MARKETS AND SECTORAL PRICE DISTORTIONS
Introduction
The Data and Methods
Results and Discussion
Implications and Conclusions for the section
5.4. EFFECTS OF THE ECB'S MONETARY POLICY ON SOVEREIGN BONDS PRICING
Introduction
The Data and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusions for the section
5.5. ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE ECB'S UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY
POLICY ON THE EUROPEAN STOCK MARKETS
Introduction
The Data and Methods
Results and Discussion
Implications and Conclusions for the section
5.6 EFFECTS OF ECB'S ASSET PURCHASES ON EUROPEAN STOCK MARKET
PRICING DURING COVID-19: A SECTORS ANALYSIS
Introduction
The Data and Methods
Results and Discussion
Implications and Conclusions for the section
5.7. PRICE DISTORTIONS AND MUNICIPAL BONDS PREMIUMS: EVIDENCE
FROM SWITZERLAND
Introduction
Data and Methodology
Results and Discussion
Implications
Conclusions for the section
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B. Russian translation of the dissertation / Перевод диссертации на
русский язык
Рекомендованный список диссертаций по специальности «Другие cпециальности», 00.00.00 шифр ВАК
Денежно-кредитная нестабильность в странах c формирующимся рынком2025 год, кандидат наук Сикхвал Швета
Эффективность зеленых облигаций на развивающихся рынках капитала2025 год, кандидат наук Фрекауцан Ион
Политическая экономика неравенства, неравноценного обмена и неравномерного развития2024 год, кандидат наук Осман Омар Мохамед Сайед
Финансирование малых и средних технологических компаний в России: гранты и собственный капитал2024 год, кандидат наук Гусева Ольга Александровна
Инструменты монетарного анализа для центральных банков2024 год, доктор наук Пономаренко Алексей Алексеевич
Введение диссертации (часть автореферата) на тему «Ценовые искажения, вмешательство государства и ценообразование на финансовых рынках»
INTRODUCTION
Research motivation
Governments are the source of most market distortions, including regulation, subsidies, taxes, and tariffs and central banks have been accused of distorting markets in recent decades with monetary policy and asset purchases. In connection to these issues, in response to the 2007 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve (Fed) implemented a number of programs, including policies to uphold liquidity of financial institutions and the stability of financial markets (Federal Reserve, 2021a). Other central banks in the world such as the European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of England (BOE), and the Bank of Japan (BOJ), among others have responded to recent financial crises with some sort of unconventional monetary policies (UMP) to maintain the lending flows in their economies and preserve financial markets stability. The common point why these UMP emerged as a key monetary tool in recent crises is the already low levels of interest rates. As interest rates approached the zero lower bound (ZLB) in the developed economies from the extensive use of conventional monetary tools, the need for quantitative easing (QE) strategies became the most prominent of tool to tackle generalized financial distress.
The main concern of this research is to address the problem about how these interventions may influence the efficient allocation of funds into the financial markets, causing non-optimal pricing of financial assets to the global investors. This topic is highly relevant in economics and finance as these monetary tools have become widely used in the last two decades and the long-run results of such interventions are still under study by many analysts worldwide.
Large literature has been developed in recent years about this topic, especially to assess the effects of such interventions as a reaction of the COVID-19 crisis, increasing the significance of this area of research.
This research addresses the main research questions of: How do government interventions, such as QE or its tapering generate long-run price distortions in the financial markets? If so, what is the significance of these effects?
Price distortions, by definition, describe significant gaps between mark-to-market prices and a plausible range of economic values of certain assets. Like information inefficiency, price distortions draw mispricing of financial assets relative to their fundamental value (Sharpe, 1964). while government interventions are perceived as any actions carried out by the government or a public entity that affects the market economy with the objective of having an
impact in the economy, beyond the mere regulation of contracts and provision of public goods (Stiglitz, 1989).
Hypotheses Development
In order to effectively respond to the research question, this research develops the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1. Liquidity excesses from central bank interventions (or dis-interventions) such as Quantitative Easing (or tapering) influence the pricing of major debt and equity assets. Hypothesis 2. The resulting price distortions from such Government interventions make a long run impact on the bond benchmark spreads and equity pricings in the financial markets. Hypothesis 3. Financial market performances have different sensitivities to the size of the central bank interventions.
Hypothesis 4. Financial market performance sensitivities vary by the central bank asset purchasing programs.
Object and subject of research
The object of this study is the financial data of the markets with the largest monetary interventions such as the U.S. and Europe during the great recession and the COVID-19 financial crises. However, a special case of a currency intervention by a central bank was also researched, that is the case of Switzerland in 2015.
The subject of this research is limited to the development of econometric models that best capture the effects of UMP on government debt and stock markets in the U.S and Europe and to the municipal bonds market, in the special case of Switzerland.
Aims and Goals of Research
This research aims at determining the effects of the UMP on the pricing in the financial markets and for that purpose it attains some goals such as proving that central bank interventions influence the pricing of major debt and equity assets, the resulting price distortions from such interventions make a long run impact on the bond benchmark spreads and equity pricings in the financial markets; financial market performances have different sensitivities to the size of the central bank interventions; and that financial market performance sensitivities vary by the form of central bank asset purchasing programs.
The methodology of the study
This study uses several relevant datasets:
• A dataset containing the credit market interventions of 2008-2013 and 2020-2021 in the U.S. as a quasi-natural experiment;
• The analysis incorporates daily trading data from the DJIA, S&P 500, the NASDAQ, and the Russell 2000 indices in the U.S. equity market, spanning from 16 December 2008 to 29 April 2022. This period encompasses the Great Recession and the Covid-19 crises;
• It incorporates other pertinent U.S. data, including the treasury yields, the USD/EUR currency exchange rate, WTI oil spot prices, Federal funds interest rate, the Volatility Index (VIX), and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for inflation;
• The analysis includes daily trading data from the S&P 500 index by sectors of the U.S. economy;
• A dataset containing the credit market interventions of 2010-2012 and 2020-2021 in the E.U. as a quasi-natural experiment;
• The analysis incorporates daily trading data from the ST0XX50, ST0XX600, Euronext100, and MSCI Europe Small Cap indices in the E.U. equity market, spanning from 2 April 2007 to 1 February 2023. This period encompasses the Great Recession, the Sovereign debt crisis and the Covid-19 crises;
• It includes country-specific variables for 14 countries which were members of the euro area in 2009 and for which the data on sovereign bond yields is available: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Slovakia;
• It incorporates other pertinent E.U. data, including the sovereign bond yields, the USD/EUR currency exchange rate, WTI oil spot prices, the discount rate (ESTR), the Volatility Index (VIX), and the Harmonized Consumer Price Index (HICP) for inflation;
• The analysis includes daily trading data from the ST0XX600 index by sectors of the E.U. economy;
• A dataset containing the currency market interventions from January 2012 to January 2018 in Switzerland. as a quasi-natural experiment;
• The analysis incorporates daily trading data from the 26 most liquid municipal bonds in the Swiss debt market, spanning from January 2012 to January 2018, that is: 3 years before and 3 years after the currency shock of January 15th, 2015. This period encompasses the period of continuous intervention of the Swiss franc;
• The analysis includes daily data on ratings and liquidity spreads by municipal bonds in the Swiss debt market.
This study employs the Instrumental Variables (IV) modeling in its Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) and Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS) methods, and the Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR). Additionally, the results of the estimations were found to be robust by the generalized method of moments (GMM) for IV analysis.
Various post-estimation tests were performed to assess the accuracy of the methods employed in each case. For that purpose tests such as the Breusch-Pagan for independence of errors, the Durwin-Wu-Hausman for instrumental variables, the Anderson Lagrangian Multiplier for identification of instrumental variables, the Cragg-Donald Wald, Stock-Yogo and Montiel-Pflueger robust relevance of Instrumental Variables were meticulously performed.
Theoretical value and policy implications
The theoretical value of this study thrives on:
1. This research makes a significant contribution by thoroughly examining the influence of central bank interventions in government debt securities amidst major economic downturns. This investigation reveals pronounced price distortions within principal U.S. equity markets;
2. It unveils novel insights regarding the discrepancy in adaptability between equity market pricing and the dynamics of the debt market, underscoring the ongoing impact of central bank policies on the valuations of equity over time;
3. The results suggest that for the 2008-2023 period, given a change in the balance sheet and in the treasury yields, these simultaneous changes are associated with changes in the valuation of each index at different rates, for which equity indices in the U.S. and Europe have different sensitivities to quantitative easing policies;
4. The results also suggest that for the 2008-2023 period, given a change in the balance sheet and in the treasury yields, these simultaneous changes are associated with changes in the valuation of each production sectors at different rates, hence economic sectors in the U.S. and Europe have different sensitivities to quantitative easing policies;
5. Unexpected large currency price shocks may have long run implications on the municipal bond spreads in Switzerland. The spread had widened after the currency shock of 2015;
6. The use of the Instrumental Variables modeling has been implemented to assess the effects UMP in various approaches (Cross-sectional, times series and Longitudinal), proving appropriate to identify the quantitative long-run effects of such interventions on the pricing of different financial markets.
Findings from this research may carry policy implications, suggesting that when policymakers seek to reduce financing costs in capital markets during financial distress through market interventions, the investment public considers the enduring effects on the pricing of financial assets, including those not directly targeted by the interventions. This could have implications for the efficient allocation of resources in the future.
Furthermore, this study provides imperative policy implications. It underscores the necessity for policymakers and the investment public to acknowledge the long-term consequences on the pricing of financial assets. This consideration is crucial to mitigate the risk of fostering inefficient valuations in assets during future implementations of market interventions.
The scientific novelty of this study
1. The assessment of potential impacts of government interventions in credit markets on the pricing of equity securities is made in this study.
2. In this research, it is proved that pricing in the debt market is directly affected by the size of the Fed and ECB's balance sheet, for which it also proved that pricings in the debt and currency markets, that may be affected by the Fed and ECB's interventions, influence the pricing of equity securities as well, at least under the simultaneous equations time-series and panel data approaches performed on the several most prominent equity markets' benchmarks both in the U.S. and Europe.
3. A new approach to measure the long-term effects of UMP interventions is developed in this study, which identifies the trends rather than the existing literature's instant impulse-response, short-term effects of the variables involved in the valuation of equity indices in the U.S. and European markets. To achieve this, the study utilizes advanced long-term identification models such as the IV 3SLS and 2SLS, corroborated further by Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations (SURE) and the Two-Step Iterated Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to estimate trends instead of short-term impulse-response estimations of other methods such as structural VAR. Hence, the estimations aim to go a step further than short-term valuations.
The main results of the study and the provisions submitted for defense
1. The empirical results show that increases in the Fed's and ECB's balance sheet, as a consequence of large-scale purchases of treasuries and MBS in the last fourteen years, have impacted the valuation of the main U.S. and European equity indices positively.
2. This research validates that pricings in the debt and currency markets that may be affected by the Fed's and the ECB's interventions influence the pricing of equity securities in the long run, at least under the simultaneous equations time-series analysis performed on the four most prominent equity markets' benchmarks.
3. This study has also been able to identify that equity indices, as measures of equity market performance, have different sensitivities to changes in yields caused by changes in the size of the central bank's balance sheet. The results prove that although the direction of the effects on index sensitivities vary upon the different interventions, the order of those sensitivities remain during the stimulations.
4. On the empirical aspect, this study used two identification strategies, the TSLS for time series and for panel data to calculate the effects of the interventions on the equity indices pricing. Based on the results of both strategies, it is fair to suggest that while the TSLS for time series approach allows us to measure the effects of the interventions on each index individually, the panel data approach is useful to estimate the marginal effects of each index within a large portfolio composed by the selected indices.
The results of this study were obtained with modern economic and statistical methods and technology based on the relevant empirical databases. All the results were verified by other researchers at forums and topic related conferences. Results of the analysis here contained allow making conclusions about the validity of the scientific Dissertation, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this Dissertation.
Structure of the Study
This dissertation is divided into this introduction, five chapters, and a list of the respective references and appendices. In the first chapter, a discussion is brought about the connection between government interventions and the pricing of financial assets in the financial markets. In the second chapter, the state of the art is reviewed with a thorough revision of the existing literature related to the key factors and variables to consider in the proposed theoretical framework outlined in the third chapter, and the various methodologies employed in related studies. In the fourth chapter, the methodological framework is developed with empirical models relying on the instrumental variables approach. In the fifth chapter the empirical results are presented with their discussion about the key results of the modeling employed in each case, their key implications, and their conclusions.
The total volume of work is 152 pages of the main text, 14 pages of references and 20 pages of appendices, and the bibliography includes 282 titles.
Validation of Study Results
The results of this study were discussed in the form of presentations at the following
conferences:
1. 11th International Research "Economics and Management Conference 2024" GSOM Saint-Petersburg, Russia, October 1-5, 2024. Presentation: Effects Of ECB's Asset Purchases On European Stock Market Pricing During Covid-19: A Sectors Analysis
2. Eurasia Business & Economics Society (EBES) at Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, January 10-12, 2024. Presentation: Assessing the Impact of Unconventional Monetary Policies on the European Stock Market Pricing
3. World Finance & Banking Symposium (WFBS) at Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania, December 13-15, 2023. Presentation: Monetary Interventions, Equity Markets and Sectoral Price Distortions
4. World Finance & Banking Symposium (WFBS) at Florida International University, Miami, USA, December 16-17, 2022. Presentation: Equity Markets Pricing and Central Bank Interventions: A Panel Data Approach
5. 9th International Research "Emerging Markets Conference 2022" GSOM Saint-Petersburg, Russia, October 5-8, 2022. Presentation: Effects of Monetary Interventions on Equity Markets Pricing: An Analysis by Sectors
6. World Finance Conference (WFC) at University of Turin, Turin, Italy, August 1-3, 2022. Presentation: Government Interventions and Equity Markets Price Distortions: Evidence from Selected Stock Indexes
7. Analytics for Management and Economics Conference (AMEC) at Higher School of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, September 23-December 25, 2020. Presentation: Price Distortions and Municipal Bonds Premiums: Evidence from Switzerland
8. Summer School of Machine Learning at Skoltech (SMILES), Moscow, Russian Federation, August 16-21, 2020. Presentation: Price Distortions and Municipal Bonds Premiums: Evidence from Switzerland
Published Related Articles
1. Rincon, Carlos J., and Darko B. Vukovic. 2024. Assessing the Impact of Federal Reserve Policies on Equity Market Valuations: An Instrumental Variables Approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17: 442
2. Rincon, Carlos J. 2024.Equity Market Pricing and Central Bank Interventions: A Panel Data Approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17: 440
3. Rincon, Carlos J., and Anastasiia V. Petrova. 2024. Assessing the Impact of the ECB's Unconventional Monetary Policy on the European Stock Markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17: 425
4. Vukovic, D.B., Rincon, C.J. & Maiti, M. Price distortions and municipal bonds premiums: evidence from Switzerland. Financial Innovation 7, 60 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00276-8
Похожие диссертационные работы по специальности «Другие cпециальности», 00.00.00 шифр ВАК
Оценка эффективности межбанковской комиссии на российском рынке безналичных розничных платёжных услуг2020 год, кандидат наук Кривошея Егор Артёмович
Компенсация СЕО, избыточная самоуверенность и решения о выплатах собственникам2021 год, кандидат наук Анилов Артём Эдуардович
Оценка эффективности сделок слияний и поглощений для публичных компаний с целью приобретения технологий и знаний2022 год, кандидат наук Очирова Елена Сергеевна
Ориентация потребителя на здоровое питание: согласование разнонаправленных интересов вовлеченных сторон2022 год, кандидат наук Ковалёнок Анастасия Юрьевна
Создание ценности в стратегических сделках роста: эмпирический анализ основных факторов (на примере 5 и 6 волн слияний)2022 год, кандидат наук Виноградова Вероника Сергеевна
Заключение диссертации по теме «Другие cпециальности», Ринкон Эрнандес Карлос Хоакин
ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ
Данное исследование рассматривает интервенции на кредитных рынках США и Европы в ответ на кредитный кризис 2007 года, кризис суверенного долга и пандемию COVID -19 как квази-естественные эксперименты для анализа того, в какой мере меры государственной поддержки — такие как программы количественного смягчения и их сворачивание — влияют на цены ключевых финансовых активов и отдельных отраслей.
Эмпирические результаты показывают, что увеличение балансов ФРС и ЕЦБ вследствие масштабных покупок казначейских облигаций, ипотечных бумаг (MBS) и суверенных облигаций оказывало положительное влияние на стоимость фондовых индексов США и Европы. Избыточная ликвидность, возникавшая в результате этих интервенций на долговом рынке, способствовала переоценке акций.
Хотя результаты подтверждают прямую зависимость доходностей долгового рынка от размера баланса ФРС, они также показывают, что долговые и валютные рынки, находящиеся под воздействием интервенций ФРС и ЕЦБ, в долгосрочной перспективе оказывают влияние на фондовые индексы. Этот вывод подтверждается анализом временных рядов с использованием системы одновременных уравнений для крупнейших фондовых индексов США и Европы.
Что касается чувствительности индексов, для США установлено, что, несмотря на различия в направлениях воздействия интервенций, относительный порядок чувствительности индексов сохраняется. Так, S&P 500, NASDAQ и Russell 2000 демонстрируют меньшую чувствительность к изменению баланса центрального банка, чем DJIA. Для Европы, согласно оценкам перекрёстной эластичности цен и доходностей относительно баланса ЕЦБ, в период пандемии COVID-19 наибольший рост показал индекс Euronext100, за ним — MSCI Europe Small Cap, тогда как ST0XX600 оказался наименее чувствителен. В период кризиса суверенного долга наиболее чувствительным оказался STOXX50, за ним Euronext100, тогда как STOXX600 вновь демонстрировал минимальную реакцию.
В целом, эффект программ ЕЦБ был статистически значимым, но относительно умеренным. Иными словами, меры ЕЦБ по стимулированию экономики в кризисные периоды не привели к значительным изменениям на фондовом рынке.
Секторальный анализ подтверждает, что, поскольку банковская отрасль является
крупнейшим участником долговых рынков США, именно банки получили наибольшую
выгоду от роста цен на казначейские облигации. Их портфели облигаций резко выросли в
стоимости весной 2020 года, когда доходности упали до исторических минимумов, что
358
способствовало превышению доходности акций банковского сектора над акциями других отраслей.
Для Европы результаты демонстрируют устойчивую отрицательную и статистически значимую зависимость между размером баланса ЕЦБ и доходностью суверенных облигаций: увеличение баланса на 1 млрд евро снижает среднюю доходность примерно на 0,48%. Это указывает на то, что меры ЕЦБ в целом оказывают понижающее воздействие на доходности вне зависимости от характеристик отдельных выпусков.
Дополнительно анализ опыта Швейцарского национального банка в 2011-2015 гг. показывает, что неожиданные валютные шоки могут оказывать долгосрочное воздействие и на другие сегменты рынка: так, после валютного шока 2015 года значительно расширились спреды муниципальных облигаций.
На основании полученных результатов можно заключить, что при проведении интервенций с целью снижения стоимости заимствований в периоды кризисов необходимо учитывать их долгосрочные последствия для ценообразования финансовых активов. Эти эффекты могут проявляться в устойчивых трендах, ведущих к переоценке и снижению эффективности рыночного ценообразования в будущем. Важно учитывать и различия источников кризисов: если кризис 2007 года имел внутреннюю природу и возник в США, то кризис 2020 года был глобальным, и именно США оказались наиболее устойчивой экономикой, куда хлынули потоки ликвидности, удержав доходности на рекордно низком уровне. В этих условиях традиционный механизм количественного смягчения мог быть избыточным.
С методологической точки зрения, исследование использует две стратегии идентификации: метод 3SLS для временных рядов и модели панельных данных для оценки предельных эффектов по индексам. Первая стратегия позволяет измерять влияние интервенций на отдельные индексы, в то время как панельный подход полезен для анализа агрегированного эффекта в рамках портфеля. Однако следует учитывать ограничения: наличие общих акций в индексах может приводить к проблемам эндогенности и мультиколлинеарности. В дальнейшем такие подходы целесообразно применять к глобальному анализу, включая индексы разных стран, где пересечений акций нет.
Ещё одно ограничение связано с тем, что исследование сосредоточено на рынках США и Европы. Расширение анализа за счёт включения азиатских и британских рынков позволило бы уточнить выявленные закономерности.
Будущие исследования должны быть направлены на более комплексное понимание последствий интервенций, включая использование панельных моделей с более широкой
359
выборкой индексов и возможностью выделения фиксированных эффектов. Более того, обнаруженные ценовые искажения (см. Приложение Н) могут указывать на наличие таких эффектов, что открывает перспективы для их изучения. Методология также может применяться для анализа по отдельным секторам и отраслям.
Таким образом, данная работа вносит вклад в понимание того, как государственные интервенции на финансовых рынках влияют на оценку активов и формирование долгосрочных ценовых тенденций.
Список литературы диссертационного исследования кандидат наук Ринкон Эрнандес Карлос Хоакин, 2025 год
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
Acharya, Sushant, and Julien Bengui. (2018). Liquidity traps, capital flows. Journal of International Economics 114: 276-98. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.06.005.
Afonso, A., Arghyrou, M. G., & Kontonikas, A. (2015). The determinants of sovereign bond yield spreads in the EMU. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, (1781).
Afonso, A., Gomes, P., & Rother, P. (2007). What "hides" behind sovereign debt ratings? European Central Bank Working Paper Series, (711).
Afonso, A., & Jalles, J. T. (2019). Quantitative easing and sovereign yield spreads: Euroarea time-varying evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 58, 208224.
Afonso, A., & Kazemi, M. (2018). Euro Area Sovereign Yields and the Power of Unconventional Monetary Policy. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 68(2), 100-119.
Aguilar, Pablo, Óscar Arce, Samuel Hurtado, Jaime Martínez-Martín, Galo Nuño, and Carlos Thomas. (2020). The ECB Monetary Policy Response to the COVID-19 Crisis. Occasional Papers No. 2026. Madrid: Banco de España. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/bde/opaper/2026e.html (accessed on 28 December 2023).
Akram, T., & Das, A. (2017). The Dynamics Of Government Bond Yields In The Euro Zone. Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), 12(03), 1-18.
Aktar, Most Asikha, Md Mahmudul Alam, and Abul Quasem Al-Amin. (2021). Global Economic Crisis, Energy Use, CO2 Emissions and Policy Roadmap Amid COVID-19. OSF Preprints No. 69kje. Charlottesville: Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/69kje.
Alberola-Ila, E., Cheng, G., Consiglio, A., & Zenios, S. A. (2022). Debt sustainability and monetary policy: the case of ECB asset purchases. Bank for International Settlements Working Papers, (1034).
Albu, Lucian L., Radu Lupu, and Adrian. C. Câlin. (2016). Quantitative easing, tapering and stock market indices. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 50: 523.
Albulescu, C., & Grecu, E. (2023). Government Interventions and Sovereign Bond Market Volatility during COVID-19: A Quantile Analysis. Mathematics, 11 (5), 1-14.
Alexopoulou, I., Bunda, I., & Ferrando, A. (2010). Determinants of government bond spreads in new EU countries. Eastern European Economics, 48(5), 5-37.
Amano, Robert, and Simon van Norden. (1995). Exchange Rates and Oil Prices. University Library of Munich, Germany. Available online:
https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpif:9509001 (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Andreeva, D. C., & Garc'ia-Posada, M. (2021). The impact of the ECB's targeted long-term refinancing operations on banks' lending policies: The role of competition. Journal of Banking & Finance, 122(100).
Andries, , A. M., Ongena, S., & Sprincean, N. (2021). The COVID-19 Pandemic and Sovereign Bond Risk. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58(100).
Ang, A., and Longstaff, F. A., (2013). Systemic sovereign credit risk: Lessons from the U.S. and Europe, Journal of Monetary Economics, 60, pp.493-510.
Ang, A., Bhansali, V., and Xing, Y., (2010). Taxes on tax-exempt bonds, The Journal of Finance, 65, pp.565-601.
Arghyrou, M. G., & Kontonikas, A. (2012). The EMU Sovereign-Debt Crisis: Fundamentals, Expectations and Contagion. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22(4), 658-677.
Asonuma, T., Niepelt, D., & Ranciere, R. (2023). Sovereign bond prices, haircuts and maturity. Journal of International Economics, 140, 103689.
Babina, T., Jotikasthira, C., Lundblad, C., and Ramadorai T., (2015). Heterogeneous taxes and limited risk sharing: Evidence from municipal bonds, Working paper, University of North Carolina.
Baglioni, A. (2024). Monetary policy implementation: Which "new normal"? Journal of International Money and Finance, 141, 102998.
Baker, J., Carreras, O., Kirby, S., & Meaning, J. (2016). The Fiscal and Monetary Determinants of Sovereign Bond Yields in the Euro Area. National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers, (466).
Batten, J., Ciner, C., & Lucey, B. (2010). The macroeconomic determinants of volatility in precious metals markets. Resources Policy, 35(2), 65-71.
Beber, A., Brandt, M. W., & Kavajecz, K. A. (2008). Flight-to-Quality or Flight-to-Liquidity? Evidence from the Euro-Area Bond Market. The Review of financial studies, 22(3), 925- 957.
Beckmann, Joscha, Robert L. Czudaj, and Vipin Arora. (2020). The relationship between oil prices and exchange rates: Revisiting theory and evidence. Energy Economics 88: 104772. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2020.104772.
Belke, A., Orth, W., & Setzer, R. (2010). Liquidity and the dynamic pattern of asset price adjustment: A global view. New Contributions to Retail Payments: Conference at Norges Bank (Central Bank of Norway) 14-15 November 2008, 34(8), 1933-1945. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjbankfin.2009.12.012
Benigno, P., Canofari, P., Di Bartolomeo, G., & Messori, M. (2020). Theory, Evidence, and Risks of the ECB's Asset Purchase Programme. Monetary Dialogue Papers, European Parliament.
Bernanke, Ben S., and Alan S. Blinder. (1992). The federal funds rate and the transmission of monetary policy. American Economic Review 82: 901-21.
Bernanke, B., Reinhart, V., & Sack, B. P. (2004). Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound: An Empirical Assessment. Brookings papers on economic activity, 2004(2), 1- 100.
Bernanke, Ben S., and Kenneth N. Kuttner. (2005). What Explains the Stock Market's Reaction to Federal Reserve Policy? The Journal of Finance 60: 1221-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00760.x.
Bernanke, Ben S. (2020). The New Tools of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review, 110 (4): 943-83. DOI: 10.1257/aer.110.4.943
Betz, F., & De Santis, R. A. (2022). ECB corporate KC and the loan supply to Bank-Dependent firms. International Journal of Central Banking.
Blot, C., Bozou, C., Creel, J., & Hubert, P. (2021). Are all Central Bank Asset Purchases the Same? Different Rationales, Different Effects. Sciences PO OFCE Working Paper n 29/2021.
Blot, C., Creel, J., Hubert, P., & Labondance, F. (2017). Eurozone bond market dynamics, ECB monetary policy and financial stress. Sciences PO OFCE Working Paper n 18/2017.
Blotevogel, R., Hudecz, G., & Vangelista, E. (2023). Asset Purchases and Sovereign Bond Spreads in the Euro Area during the Pandemic. Journal of International Money and Finance, 102978.
Boeckx, Jef, Maarten Dossche, and Gert Peersman. (2014). Effectiveness and Transmission of the ECB's Balance Sheet Policies. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4907. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2482978.
Boehl, G., Goy, G., & Strobel, F. (2022). A Structural Investigation of Quantitative Easing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1-45.
Brana, Sophie, and Stéphanie Prat. (2016). The effects of global excess liquidity on emerging stock market returns: Evidence from a panel threshold model. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Decision-Making, Monetary Policy and Financial Markets 52: 26-34. https://doi.org/10.10167j.econmod.2015.06.026.
Breusch, T., & Pagan, A. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287.
Breusch, Trevor S., and Adrian R. Pagan. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications
to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies 47: 239-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111.
Broadstock, David C., and George Filis. (2014). Oil price shocks and stock market returns: New evidence from the United States and China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions andMoney 33: 417-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2014.09.007.
Campos, N. F., & Macchiarelli, C. (2021). The dynamics of core and periphery in the European monetary union: A new approach. Journal of International Money and Finance, 112, 102325.
Cantor, R., & Packer, F. (1996). Determinants and impact of sovereign credit ratings. The Journal of Fixed Income, 6(3), 76-91.
Cassola, Nuno, Ali Horta9su, and Jakub Kastl. (2013). The 2007 SubprimeMarket Crisis through the Lens of European Central Bank Auctions for Short-Term Funds. Working Paper Series No. 1374. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.
Chari, Anusha, Karlye Dilts Stedman, and Christian Lundblad. (2017). Taper Tantrums: KC, its Aftermath and Emerging Market Capital Flows. No 23474, NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23474.
Chari, V. V., Alessandro Dovis, and Patrick J. Kehoe. (2017). Reforming the European Monetary Union. Tech. Rep. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Chen, Shiu-Sheng. (2007). Does monetary policy have asymmetric effects on stock returns? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39: 667-88.
Chen, Wang, Shigeyuki Hamori, and Takuji Kinkyo. (2014). Macroeconomic impacts of oil prices and underlying financial shocks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 29: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2013.11.006.
Chen, Xingyi, Zhijing Wang, Xinyi Li, Zhongyang Liu, and Kun Li. (2021). The Impact of Covid-19 on the Securities Market: Evidence from Chinese Stock and Bond Markets. Paper presented at 2020 International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things, IIKI2020, Bangkok, Thailand, November 18-22, vol. 187, pp. 294-
Choi, Sun-Yong. (2020). Industry volatility and economic uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. Finance Research Letters 37: 101783. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101783
CNBC., (2021). Fed to start tapering bond purchases later this month as it begins pulling back on pandemic aid. https://www.cnbc.com/2021711/03/fed-decision-taper-timetable-as-it-starts-pulling-back-on-pandemic-era-economic-aid-.html. Accessed 10 Nov 2021
Cochrane, John H. (2005). Asset Pricing, Rev. ed., Princeton University Press.
Cochrane, John H. (2017). The New-Keynesian liquidity trap. Journal of Monetary Economics 92: 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjmoneco.2017.09.003.
Cochrane, John H. (2018). Michelson-Morley, Fisher, and Occam: The Radical Implications of Stable Quiet Inflation at the Zero Bound. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 32: 113-226. https://doi.org/10.1086/696050.
Codogno, L., Favero, C. A., & Missale, A. (2003). Yield spreads on EMU government bonds. Economic Policy, 75(37), 503-532.
Constancio, V. (2018). Past and Future of the ECB Monetary Policy.
Costantini, M., Fragetta, M., & Melina, G. (2014). Determinants of Sovereign Bond Yield Spreads in the EMU: An Optimal Currency Area Perspective. European Economic Re- view, 70, 337349.
Costantini, M., & Sousa, R. M. (2022). What uncertainty does to euro area sovereign bond markets: Flight to safety and flight to quality. Journal of International Money andFinance, 122, 102574.
Cour-Thimann, Philippine. (2013). Monetary policy and redistribution: Information from central bank balance sheets in the Euro area and the US. Review of Economics 64: 293-324.
Cox, Jeff. (2021). Fed to Start Tapering Bond Purchases Later This Month as it Begins Pulling Back on Pandemic Aid. CNBC. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/03/fed-decision-
taper-timetable-as-it-starts-pulling-back-on-pandemic-era-economic-aid-.html (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Cox, John C., Jonathan E. Ingersoll, and Stephen A. Ross. (1985). A Theory of the Term Structure
of Interest Rates. Econometrica 53: 385. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911242. Cragg, John G., and Stephen Donald. (1993). Testing Identifiability and Specification in Instrumental
Variable Models. Econometric Theory 9: 222-40. D'Amico, Stefania, and Thomas King. (2010). Flow and Stock Effects of Large-Scale Treasury Purchases (Issues 2010-52). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.). Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/repec:fip:fedgfe:2010-52 (accessed on 27 August 2022).
D'Amico, Stefania and Tim Seida. (2024). Unexpected Supply Effects of Quantitative Easing and
Tightening. The Economic Journal 134: 579-613. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead071. D'Amico, Stefania, William English, David Lopez-Salido, and Edward Nelson. (2012). The Federal Reserve's Large-Scale Asset Purchase Programs: Rationale and Effects (Issue 9145). C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/repec:cpr:ceprdp:9145 (accessed on 27 August 2022). Dammon, Robert M., Chester S. Spatt, and Harold H. Zhang, (2004). Optimal Asset Location and
Allocation with Taxable and Tax-Deferred Investing, Journal of Finance 59, 999-1037. Degiannakis, Stavros, George Filis, and Vipin Arora. (2018). Oil Prices and Stock Markets. The
Energy Journal 39: 85-130. De Grauwe, P., & Ji, Y. (2013). Self-fulfilling Crises in the Eurozone: An Empirical Test. Journal of
International Money and Finance, 34, 15-36. De Santis, R. A., & Holm-Hadulla, F. (2020). Flow Effects of Central Bank Asset Purchases on Sovereign Bond Prices: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52(6), 1467-1491. Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. De Vet, J. M., Nigohosyan, D., Ferrer, J. N., Gross, A.-K., Kuehl, S., and Flickenschild, M. (2021).
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on EU industries. European Parliament Strasbourg, France. Della Corte, P., Sarno, L., Schmeling, M., & Wagner, C. (2022). Exchange rates and sovereign risk.
Management Science, 68(8), 5591-5617. Dell'Ariccia, Giovanni, Pau Rabanal, and Damiano Sandri. (2018). Unconventional monetary policies in the euro area, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32: 147-72.
Demiralp, S., Eisenschmidt, J., & Vlassopoulos, T. (2021). Negative Interest Rates, Excess Liquidity and Retail Deposits: Banks' Reaction to Unconventional Monetary Policy in the Euro Area. European Economic Review, 136, 103745. Doh, Taeyoung. (2010). The efficacy of large-scale asset purchases at the zero lower bound.
Economic Review 95: 5-34. Downing, C., and Zhang, F., (2004). Trading activity and price volatility in the municipal bond
market. The Journal of Finance, 59, pp.899-931. Dudley, W. (2010). The Outlook, Policy Choices and Our Mandate. Speech from Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Dunne, P. G., Everett, M., & Stuart, R. (2015). The Expanded Asset Purchase Programme - what,
why and how of Euro area KC. Quarterly Bulletin Articles, 61-71. ECB. (2014). The Determinants of Euro Area Sovereign Bond Yield Spreads during the Crisis. Monthly Bulletin.
EIKON Refinitive. (2022). Eikon Financial Analysis & Trading Software | Refinitiv. https://solutions.refinitiv.com/eikon-trading-
software?utm_content=Refinitiv%20Brand%20Product-CEE-EMEA-G-EN-
BMM&utm_medium0/o20=cpc&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=68832_RefinitivBAUPa
idSearch&elqCampaignId=5917&utm_term=%20%20refinitiv%20%20eikon&gclid=EAIaIQo
bChMI5eiJ_OjO6gIVgbHtCh3ODAUKCAAYASAAEgKcvPD_BwE
Eichengreen, B., & Mody, A. (2000). Lending booms, reserves and the sustainability of short- term debt: inferences from the pricing of syndicated bank loans. Journal of Development Economics, 63(1), 5-44.
Eijffinger, S., & Pieterse-Bloem, M. (2023). Eurozone government bond spreads: A tale of different ECB policy regimes. Journal of International Money and Finance, 139, 102965.
Engel, Charles. (2016). Exchange Rates, Interest Rates, and the Risk Premium. The American Economic Review 106: 436-74.
Engen, E., & Hubbard, G. (2004). Federal Government Debt and Interest Rates. Nber Macroeconomics Annual, 19, 83-138.
Eser, F., Lemke, W., Nyholm, K., Radde, S., & Vladu, A. L. (2019). Tracing the impact of the ECB's asset purchase programme on the yield curve. European Central Bank Working Paper Series.
European Central Bank. (2009). The Impact of the First One-Year Longer-Term Refinancing Operation. Monthly Bulletin.
European Central Bank. (2010). The ECB's Response to the Financial Crisis. Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available online:
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/art1_mb201010en_pp59-74en.pdf (accessed on 28 December 2023).
European Central Bank. (2020a). ECB Announces €750 Billion Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme (PEPP). Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available online: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ecb.pr200318_1~3949d6f266.en.html (accessed on 28 December 2023).
European Central Bank. (2020b). ECB Announces Measures to Support Bank Liquidity Conditions and Money Market Activity. European Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available online: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ecb.pr200312_ 2~06c32dabd1.en.html (accessed on 28 December 2023).
European Central Bank. (2020c). ECB Announces New Pandemic Emergency Longer-Term Refinancing Operations (LTRO). Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available online: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ecb.pr200430_1~477f400e39.en.html (accessed on 28 December 2023).
European Central Bank. (2020d). The ECB's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available online:
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2020/html/ecb.sp200416~4d6bd9b9c0.en.html (accessed on 28 December 2023).
European Central Bank. (2020e). Our Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic. Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available online:
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/search/coronavirus/html/index.en.html (accessed on 28 December 2023).
Fabozzi, F., (2007). Fixed income analysis. 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fabozzi, F., (2009). Bond markets, analysis and strategies. 7th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Falagiarda, M., & Reitz, S. (2015). Announcements of ECB unconventional programs: Implications for the sovereign spreads of stressed euro area countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 53, 276-295.
Fama, Eugene F. (1965). Random Walks in Stock Market Prices. Financial Analysts Journal 21: 5559.
Fama, E. F. (1977). A pricing model for the municipal bond market, working paper, University of Chicago.
Fama, Eugene F.; French, Kenneth R. (1993). "Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds". Journal of Financial Economics. 33 (1): 3-56. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. (2002). The Equity Premium. The Journal of Finance 57: 637-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00437.
Fama, Eugene, F., and Kenneth R. French. (2004). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3): 25-46. DOI: 10.1257/0895330042162430
Farinha, J. B. and Vidrago, J. (2021). The impact of the ECB's asset purchase programme on euro area equities. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 82:270-279.
Favero, C. A., Pagano, M., & Von Thadden, E. (2009). How Does Liquidity Affect Government Bond Yields? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(1), 107-134.
Federal Reserve. (2021a). Federal Reserve Board-Crisis Response. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Available online:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_crisisresponse.htm (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Federal Reserve. (2021b). Federal Reserve Board-Open market operations. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Available online:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_openmarketops.htm (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Federal Reserve. (2021c). Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Available online:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20211103a.htm (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Federal Reserve. (2021d). Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Available online:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20211215a.htm (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Federal Reserve. (2020). Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Available online:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20200315a.htm (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Filippidis, M., Filis, G., & Kizys, R. (2020). Oil Price Shocks and EMU Sovereign Yield Spreads. Energy Economics, 86, 104656.
Fisher, Franklin M. (1970). Simultaneous Equations Estimation: The State of the Art. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics. Working Papers, no. 55. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/mit/worpap/55.html (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Fratzscher, Marcel, Daniel Schneider, and Ine Van Robays. (2013). Oil Prices, Exchange Rates and Asset Prices. CESifo Working Paper Series 4264, CESifo. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2269027.
Fratzscher, Marcel, Marco Lo Duca, and Roland Straub. (2016). ECB unconventional monetary policy: Market impact and international spillovers. IMF Economic Review 64: 36-74.
Gadanecz, B., Miyajima, K., & Shu, C. (2014). Exchange rate risk and local currency sovereign bond yields in emerging markets. BIS Working Papers, (474).
Gagnon, J., Leslie, J., Smith, J., & Rahman, F. (2019). Quantitative (Displ)easing?: Does KC Work and How Should It Be Used Next Time? Resolution Foundation.
Gagnon, Joseph, Matthew Raskin, Julie Remache, and Brian Sack. (2011). The Financial Market Effects of the Federal Reserve's Large-Scale Asset Purchases. International Journal of Central Banking 7: 3-43.
Galper, H. and J. Peterson, (1971). An analysis of subsidy plans to support state and local borrowing, National Tax Journal 24, 344-67.
Gartner, M., Griesbach, B., & Jung, F. (2011). PIGS or lambs? The European sovereign debt crisis and the role of rating agencies. International advances in economic research, 17(3), 288-299.
Geanakoplos, John, and Haobin Wang. (2020). Quantitative easing, collateral constraints, and financial spillovers. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 12: 180-217.
Gibson, H. D., Hall, S. G., & Tavlas, G. S. (2012). The Greek financial crisis: Growing im- balances and sovereign spreads. Journal of international money andfinance, 31(3), 498- 516.
Gill, N. (2018). A Research on Eurozone Bond Market and Determinants of Sovereign Bond Yields. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 07(02), 174-190.
Gomez-Puig, M., Sosvilla-Rivero, S., & Del Carmen Ramos-Herrera, M. (2014). An update on EMU sovereign yield spread drivers in times of crisis: A panel data analysis. The North American journal of economics and finance, 30, 133-153.
Gonzalez-Fernandez, M., & Gonzalez-Velasco, C. (2018). Bond yields, sovereign risk and maturity structure. Risks, 6(4), 109.
Gonzalez-Paramo, Jose' Manuel. (2009). The response of the eurosystem to the financial crisis. Speech at the European Parliament's Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (CRIS).
Gonzalez-Paramo, J. M. (2012). The ECB and the Sovereign Debt Crisis.Moneday credito, (234), 263-280.
Grabner, C., & Hafele, J. (2020). The emergence of core-periphery structures in the European Union: A complexity perspective. ICAE Working Papers, (113).
Green, R., Li, D., and Schurhoff, N., (2010). Price discovery in illiquid markets: Do financial asset prices rise faster than they fall? The Journal of Finance, 65, pp.1669-1702.
Green, R. C. (1993). A simple model of the taxable and tax-exempt yield curves, Review of Financial Studies 6, 233-264.
Green, R. C. and Odegaard, B. A., (1997). Are there tax effects in the relative pricing of U.S. government bonds, Journal of Finance 52, 609-633.
Green, R. C., (2007). Issuers, Underwriter Syndicates, and Aftermarket Transparency, Journal of Finance 62 1529-1550.
Guerini, M., Lamperti, F., & Mazzocchetti, A. (2018). Unconventional monetary policy: between the past and future of monetary economics. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 15(2), 122-131.
Guerrieri, Veronica, and Guido Lorenzoni. (2017). Credit Crises, Precautionary Savings, and the Liquidity Trap*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132: 1427-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx005.
Haitsma, R., Unalmis, D., and De Haan, J. (2016). The impact of the ECB's conventional and unconventional monetary policies on stock markets. Journal of Macroeconomics, 48:101-116.
Hamilton, James, and Jing Cynthia Wu. (2012). The Effectiveness of Alternative Monetary Policy Tools in a Zero Lower Bound Environment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44: 3-46.
Hammermann, F., Leonard, K., Nardelli, S., & von Landesberger, J. (2019). Taking Stock of the Eurosystem's Asset Purchase Programme after the End of Net Asset Purchases. Economic Bulletin Articles, 2.
Hammoudeh, S., Nguyen, D. K., & Sousa, R. M. (2015). US monetary policy and sectoral commodity prices. Journal of International Money and Finance, 57, 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjimonfin.2015.06.003
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251. Hausman, J. A., & Taylor, W. E. (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1377.
Hausman, Jerry. (1983). Specification and estimation of simultaneous equation models. In Handbook of Econometrics. Edited by Zvi Griliches and Michael. D. Intriligator. Elsevier, vol. 1, pp. 391448. Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/repec:eee:ecochp:1-07 (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Hausman, Jerry, Whitney Newey, and William Taylor. (1987). Efficient Estimation and Identification of Simultaneous Equation Models with Covariance Restrictions. Econometrica 55: 849-74.
Hempel, G., (1972). An evaluation of municipal bankruptcy laws and proceedings, Journal of Finance 27, 1012-1029.
Herradi, Mehdi E., and Aurelien Leroy. (2023). Navigating the Well-Being Effects of Monetary Policy: Evidence from the Euro Area. IMF Working Papers 2023/248, International Monetary Fund. https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfwpa/2023-248.html (accessed on 17 September 2024).
Hill, Charles A., and Sarah Marie M. Bruno. (2024). Liquidity and Resilience in the Core European Sovereign Bond Markets. Zurich: International Capital Market Association (ICMA). Available online: https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/ICMA_BMLT_Liquidity-and-resilience-in-the-core-European-sovereign-bond-markets_March-2024.pdf (accessed on 28 December 2023).
Hofmann, B., Shim, I., & Shin, H. S. (2016). Sovereign yields and the risk-taking channel of currency appreciation. BIS Working Papers, (538).
Hommes, Cars, Domenico Massaro, and Isabelle Salle. (2019). Monetary and fiscal policy design at the zero lower bound: Evidence from the lab. Economic Inquiry 57: 1120-40. https://doi .org/10.1111/ecin.12741.
Hondroyiannis, G., & Papaoikonomou, D. (2021). The effect of Eurosystem asset purchase programmes on euro area sovereign bond yields during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Inoue, Atsushi, and Barbara Rossi. (2019). The effects of conventional and unconventional monetary policy on exchange rates. Journal of International Economics 118: 419-47.
International Energy Agency. (2024). IEA Oil Information Statistics.
Izquierdo-Cervera, E., & Sogorb-Mira, F. (2023). An assessment of the impact of the PSPP on spanish public bonds. Studies in Economics and Finance, 40(5), 971-995.
Hull, J. and Alan White, (1990). Pricing interest-rate derivative securities, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol 3, No. 4 pp. 573-592
Jiang, Xiao-Wan. (2019). The Impact of Government Intervention on Municipal Bond Liquidity Premium: Evidence from China. Applied Economics and Finance 6: 79-86.
Jones, E. (2022). The War in Ukraine and the European Central Bank. Survival, 64, 111-119.
Joyce, Michael, David Miles, Andrew Scott, and Dimitri Vayanos. (2012). Quantitative easing and unconventional monetary policy-An introduction. The Economic Journal 122: F271-F88.
Kanno, M. (2021). Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on major industries in japan: A dynamic conditional correlation approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 58:101488.
Khemraj, Tarron, and Sherry Yu. (2015). The Effectiveness of Quantitative Easing: New Evidence on Private Investment. Applied Economics, vol. 48(28), pages 2625-2635. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1125439.
Kiley, M. T. (2018). Quantitative Easing and the "New normal" in Monetary Policy. Finance and economics discussion series, 2018(004).
Kilian, Lutz. (2009). Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: Disentangling Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market. American Economic Review 99: 1053-69. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.1053.
Kimbal, R. (1977). Commercial banks, tax-avoidance and the market for state and local debt, New England Economics Review, January/February, 80-97.
Kinateder, H., & Wagner, N. (2017). Quantitative easing and the pricing of EMU sovereign debt. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 66, 1-12.
Kinoshita, N. (2006). Government Debt and Long-Term Interest Rates. IMF working paper, 06(63),1.
Korinek, Anton, and Alp Simsek. (2016). Liquidity Trap and Excessive Leverage. American Economic Review 106: 699-738. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20140289.
Kosmidou, K. V., Kousenidis, D. V., and Negakis, C. I. (2015). The impact of the EU/ECB/IMF bailout programs on the financial and real sectors of the ASE during the Greek sovereign crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 50:440-454.
Krishnamurthy, A., Nagel, S., & Vissing-J0rgensen, A. (2017). ECB Policies involving government
bond purchases: impact and channels*. Review of Finance, 22(1), 1-44.
Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-J0rgensen, A. (2011). The Effects of Quantitative Easing on Interest Rates: Channels and Implications for Policy. Brookings papers on economic activity, 2011(2), 215-287.
Krugman, Paul. (1980). Oil and the Dollar (Issue 0554). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/repec:nbr:nberwo:0554 (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Krugman, Paul, and M. Obstfeld. (2006). International Economics: Theory and Policy. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Available online: https://books.google.vu/books?id = 7ep-ngEACAAJ (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Kumar, M., & Baldacci, E. (2010). Fiscal Deficits, Public Debt, and Sovereign Bond Yields. IMF Working Papers, (2010/184).
Kumar, M., & Hauner, D. (2006). Fiscal Policy and Interest Rates: How Sustainable is the "New Economy"? IMF working paper, 06(112), 1.
Kumar, M., & Okimoto, T. (2011). Dynamics of International Integration of Government Securities' Markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(1), 142-154.
Labonte, M. (2019). Monetary Policy and the Federal Reserve: Current Policy and Conditions. Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Lane, P. R. (2012). The European Sovereign Debt Crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 49-68.
Lawson, A. (2020). The European Central Bank's Three-Year Long-Term Refinancing Operations (ECB GFC). Journal of Financial Crises, 2(3), 352-368.
Lee, C., Lee, C., & Ning, S.-L. (2017). Dynamic relationship of oil price shocks and country risks. Energy Economics, 66, 571-581.
Lhuissier, S., & Nguyen, B. (2021). The dynamic Effects of the ECB's asset Purchases: A Survey-Based identification. Banque de France Working papers, (806).
Li, Zhong-Fei, Qi Zhou, Ming Chen, and Qian Liu. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on industry-related characteristics and risk contagion. Finance Research Letters 39: 101931.
Lintner, John (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics. 47 (1): 13-37. doi:10.2307/1924119
Lleo, S. and Ziemba, William T., (2015). The Swiss Black Swan Bad Scenario: Is Switzerland Another Casualty of the Eurozone Crisis? Int. J. Financ. Stud., 3, 351-380
Loisel, O. & Mesonnier, J.S. (2009). Unconventional monetary policy measures in response to the crisis," Current issues 1, Banque de France.
Longstaff, F. A., Pan, J., Pedersen, L. H., & Singleton, K. J. (2011). How sovereign is sovereign credit risk? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 3(2), 75-103.
Longstaff, F., (2011). Municipal debt and marginal tax rates: Is there a tax premium in asset prices? The Journal of Finance, 66, pp.721-751.
Magone, J. M., Laffan, B., & Schweiger, C. (2016). Core-periphery relations in the European Union: power and conflict in a dualist political economy.
Malliaropulos, D., & Migiakis, P. M. (2023). A global monetary policy factor in sovereign bond yields. Journal of Empirical Finance, 70, 445-465.
Maltritz, D. (2012). Determinants of sovereign yield spreads in the Eurozone: A Bayesian approach. Journal of international money and finance, 31(3), 657-672.
Manchester, P. and Antony Davies., (2009). Implications of foreign investment patterns for federal, state, and local bond financing, Working Paper, Duquesne University.
Markowitz, H.M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance. 7 (1): 77-91. doi:10.2307/2975974
Marshall, Alfred (1890). Principles of Economics. Vol. 1 (First ed.). London: Macmillan. Retrieved
2012-12-07.
McCauley, R. N. (2018). The 2008 Crisis: Transpacific or Transatlantic? BIS Quarterly Review. McGuire, P., & Tarashev, N. (2008). Bank health and lending to emerging markets. BIS Quarterly Review.
Meaning, J., & Zhu, F. (2011). The impact of recent central bank asset purchase programmes. BIS Quarterly Review.
Melidis, M., & Tzagkarakis, S. I. (2021). The evolution of social vulnerability in Greece during the economic crisis (2008-2017). European societies, 24(2), 229-250.
Mellios, C., & Paget-Blanc, E. (2006). Which factors determine sovereign credit ratings? European journal of finance, 12(4), 361-377.
Miller, M., (1977). Debt and Taxes, The Journal of Finance, 32 (2), pp.261-275.
Mishkin, Frederic S. (2009). Is monetary policy effective during financial crises? American Economic Review 99: 573-77.
Mody, A., & Nedeljkovic, M. (2024). Central bank policies and financial markets: Lessons from the euro crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 158, 107033.
Moessner, Richhild. (2015). Effects of ECB balance sheet policy announcements on inflation expectations. Applied Economics Letters 22: 483-87.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2014.950791.
Moessner, R., & De Haan, J. (2022). Effects of Monetary Policy Announcements on Term Premia in the Euro Area during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102055.
Mokni, Khaled. (2020). Time-varying effect of oil price shocks on the stock market returns: Evidence from oil-importing and oil-exporting countries. Energy Reports 6: 605-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.03.002.
Montgomery, Heather, and Ulrich Volz. (2019). The Effectiveness of Unconventional Monetary Policy in Japan. Journal of Economic Issues 53: 411-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2019.159
Morelli, Pierluigi, and Elena Seghezza. (2021). Why was the ECB's reaction to COVID-19 crisis faster than after the 2008 financial crash? Journal of Policy Modeling 43: 1-14.
Moschella, M., & Romelli, D. (2023). Inflation Dynamics and Monetary Policy in the Euro Area and the US. Monetary Dialogue Papers, (PE 755.704). Requested by the ECON Committee.
Mossin, Jan (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica. 34 (4): 768-783. doi:10.2307/1910098
Naape, B. (2019). An Analysis of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis: Was Quantitative Easing Appropriate? (MPRA Paper No. 97816). University Library of Munich, Germany.
Narayanan, R. (1969). Computation of Zellner-Theil's Three Stage Least Squares Estimates. Econometrica 37: 298-306. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913538.
Nicholson, W. and Snyder, C.M., (2012). Microeconomic theory: Basic principles and extensions. Cengage Learning.
Novy-Marx, R., and Joshua D. Rauh, (2011). Public pension promises: How big are they and what are they worth? The Journal of Finance, 66, pp.1211-1249.
O'Donnell, Niall, Darren Shannon, and Barry Sheehan Shannon. (2024). The impact of monetary policy interventions on banking sector stocks: An empirical investigation of the COVID-19 crisis. Financ Innov 10: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00575-2.
Olea, José Luis Montiel, and Carolin Pflueger. (2013). A Robust Test for Weak Instruments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 31: 358-69.
Pamies, S., Carnot, N., & Pâtârâu, A. (2021). Do Fundamentals Explain Differences between Euro Area Sovereign Interest Rates. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
Pan, J., & Singleton, K. J. (2008). Default and recovery implicit in the term structure of sovereign CDS spreads. The Journal of Finance, 63(5), 2345-2384.
Pappas, A. P., & Kostakis, I. (2020). The driving factors of EMU government bond yields: the role
of debt, liquidity and fiscal councils. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(3), 53.
Patelis, Alex D. (1997). Stock return predictability and the role of monetary policy. The Journal of Finance 52: 1951-72.
Peersman, Gert, Sebastian K. Rüth, and Wouter Van der Veken. (2021). The interplay between oil and food commodity prices: Has it changed over time? Journal of International Economics 133: 103540. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjinteco.2021.103540.
Perera, Anil, Deborah Ralston, and Jayasinghe Wickramanayake. (2013). Central Bank financial strength and inflation: Is there a robust link? Journal of Financial Stability 9: 399-414.
Petrakis, N., Lemonakis, C., Floros, C., & Zopounidis, C. (2022). Greek banking sector stock reaction to ecb's monetary policy interventions. JRFM, 15(10), 1-19.
Pflueger, Carolin E., and Su Wang. (2015). A Robust Test for Weak Instruments in Stata. The Stata Journal 15: 216-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867 x 1501500113.
Poghosyan, T. (2014). Long-run and short-run determinants of sovereign bond yields in advanced economies. Economic Systems, 38(1), 100-114.
Quaglia, L., & Verdun, A. (2022). Explaining the response of the ECB to the COVID-19 related economic crisis: inter-crisis and intra-crisis learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(4), 635-654.
Quint, D., & Rabanal, P. (2017). Should Unconventional Monetary Policies Become Conventional? IMF working paper, 17(85), 1.
Rao, D. Tripati., and Rahul. Kumar. (2023). An Assessment of Unconventional Monetary Policy During COVID-19 Pandemic in India. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 22: 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/09726527231163207.
Reichlin, L., & Pill, H. (2015). Exceptional policies for exceptional times: The ECB's response to the rolling crises of the euro area.
Reinhart, V., & Sack, B. P. (2000). The Economic Consequences of Disappearing Government Debt. Brookings papers on economic activity, 2000(2), 163-209.
Reis, R. (2016). KC in the future: the central bank's balance sheet in a financial crisis (Discussion Papers No. 1620). Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
Reusens, P., & Croux, C. (2017). Sovereign credit rating determinants: A comparison before and after the European debt crisis. Journal of banking finance, 77, 108-121.
Ricci, O. (2015). The impact of monetary policy announcements on the stock price of large European banks during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52:245-255.
Rigobon, Roberto, and Brian Sack. (2003). Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 639-69.
Rigobon, Roberto, and Brian Sack. (2004). The impact of monetary policy on asset prices. Journal of Monetary Economics 51: 1553-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjmoneco.2004.02.004.
Rincon, C., & Petrova, A. (2024). Assessing the Impact of the ECB's Unconventional Monetary Policy on the European Stock Markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17: 425
Rocheteau, Guillaume, Randall Wright, and Sylvia Xiaolin Xiao. (2018). Open market operations. Journal of Monetary Economics 98: 114-28.
Ronkainen, A., & Sorsa, V.-P. (2017). Quantitative easing Forever? Financialization and the institutional legitimacy of the Federal Reserve's unconventional monetary policy. New Political Economy, 23(6), 711-727.
Runkel, C. (2022). European central bank: Term refinancing operations. Journal of Financial Crises, 4(2), 817-843.
Sahuc, J.-G. (2016). The ECB's Asset Purchase Programme: A Model-Based Evaluation. Economics Letters, 145(100), 136-140.
Samuelson, Paul A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895.
Sargan, John D. (1964). Three-Stage Least-Squares and Full Maximum Likelihood Estimates.
Econometrica 32: 77-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913735.
Sargent, Thomas J., and Neil Wallace. (1976). Rational expectations and the theory of economic policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 2: 169-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(76)90032-5
Schnabel, I. (2023). Quantitative Tightening: Rationale and Market Impact. Speech at the Money Market Contact Group meeting, Frankfurt am Main.
Schnabel, I. (2020). Going negative: The ecb's experience. In 35th congress of the eea. Member of the ECB Executive Board.
Schrank, Johannes. (2024). The impact of a crisis on monetary policy's influence on financial markets: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Economics & Finance 12(1).
Schwaab, B., & Eser, F. (2013). Assessing asset purchases within the ECB's securities markets programme. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, (1587).
Schwert, M., (2017). Municipal Bond Liquidity and Default Risk. The Journal of Finance. 72, pp.1683-1722.
Segal, P. (2011). Oil price shocks and the macroeconomy. Oxford review of economic policy, 27(1), 169-185.
Sester, P. (2012). The ECB's Controversial Securities Market Programme (SMP) and its role in relation to the modified EFSF and the future ESM. European Company and Financial Law Review, 9(2).
Sharpe, William F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk*. The Journal of Finance 19: 425-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x.
Sharpe, W. F. (1991). Capital Asset Prices with and without Negative Holdings. The Journal of Finance, 46(2), 489-509. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328833
Shiller, Robert J. (1978). Rational expectations and the dynamic structure of macroeconomic models: A critical review. Journal of Monetary Economics 4: 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(78)90032-6.
Shirai, S. (2009). The Impact of the US Subprime Mortgage Crisis on the World and East Asia. MPRA Paper, (14722).
Shoven, J. B., and Sialm, C. (2004). Asset location in tax-deferred and conventional savings accounts. Journal of Public Economics, 88(1-2), 23-38.
Smaghi, L. B. (2009). Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy. Keynote Lecture at the International Centre for Monetary and Banking Studies (ICMB). 1-21.
Smith, Alasdair (1987). "Shadow Price Calculations in Distorted Economies". The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 89 (3): 287-302. doi:10.2307/3440199
Smith, A. (2020). The European Central Bank's Covered Bond Purchase Programs I and II (ECB GFC). The Journal of Financial Crises, 2(3), 382-404.
Starrett, David A. (2000). "Shadow Pricing in Economics". Ecosystems. 3 (1): 16-20. ISSN 14329840
Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Markets, Market Failures, and Development. The American Economic Review, 79(2), 197-203. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827756
Stock, James, and Mark Watson. (2001). Vector Autoregressions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 101-15. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15A101.
Stock, James, and Mark Watson. (1996). Evidence on Structural Instability in Macroeconomic Time Series Relations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14: 11-30.
Stock, James, and Motohiro Yogo. (2005). Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models. Edited by Donald W. K. Andrews, Ed.; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80-108. Available online: http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/stock/files/TestingWeakInstr_Stock\%2BYogo.pdf (accessed on 27 August 2022).
Swanson, E. T. (2018). The Federal Reserve Is Not Very Constrained by the Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 555-572. Publisher: Brookings Institution Press.
Szczepanski, M. (2019). A decade on from the crisis: Main responses and remaining challenges. EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service. PE 642.253.
Szczerbowicz, U. (2015). The ECB's Unconventional Monetary Policies: Have they lowered market borrowing costs for banks and governments? International Journal of Central Banking, 11(4), 91-128.
The Economist, (2015). Why the Swiss unpegged the franc. [online] Available at: <https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2015/01/18/why-the-swiss-unpegged-the-franc> [Accessed 10 November 2019].
Titzck, S., & van den End, J. W. (2021). The Impact of Size, Composition and Duration of the Central Bank Balance Sheet on Inflation Expectations and Market Prices. The European Journal of Finance, 27(12), 1186-1209.
Trebesch, C., & Zettelmeyer, J. (2014). ECB Interventions in Distressed Sovereign Debt Markets: The Case of Greek Bonds (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4731). CESifo.
Treynor, Jack L. (1961). Market Value, Time, and Risk. Unpublished manuscript dated 8/8/61, No. 95-209.
Trichet, Jean-Claude. (2009). The ECB's Enhanced Credit Support. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2833. Munich: CESifo. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_2833.html (accessed on 28 December 2023).
Trzcinka C., (1982). The Pricing of Tax-Exempt Bonds and the Miller Hypothesis, The Journal of Finance, 37 (4), pp.907-923.
Urbschat, F., & Watzka, S. (2020). Quantitative easing in the Euro Area - An event study approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 77(100), 14-36.
Van Riet, A. (2017). The ECB's Fight against Low Inflation: On the Effects of Ultra-Low Interest Rates. International Journal of Financial Studies, 5(2), 12.
Van Lamoen, R., Mattheussen, S., & Droes, M. (2017). Quantitative easing and exuberance in government bond markets: Evidence from the ECB's expanded asset purchase program. De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper No. 548.
Vasicek, Oldrich. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics 5: 177-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90016-2.
Vayanos, D., & Vila, J. (2021). A Preferred-Habitat Model of the Term Structure of Interest Rates. Econometrica, 89(1), 77-112.
Vukovic, Darko B., Carlos J. Rincon, and Moinak Maiti. (2021). Price distortions and municipal bonds premiums: Evidence from Switzerland. Financial Innovation 7: 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00276-8.
Vukovic, Darko, Kseniya A. Lapshina, and Moinak Maiti. (2019). European Monetary Union bond market dynamics: Pre & post crisis. Research in International Business and Finance 50: 36980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.04.001.
Vukovic D., Vyklyuk Y., Matsiuk N., Maiti M. (2020a). Neural network forecasting in prediction Sharpe ratio: Evidence from EU debt market // Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 1-20. 123331, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123331
Vukovic, D., Maiti, M., Kochetkov, D., Bystryakov, A. (2020b). How Attractive are Municipal Bonds for the Passive Competitiveness: the Case of Immunization of Municipal Bonds, Competitiveness Review, (In Press), DOI: 10.1108/CR-02-2020-0024
Wagner, Adolf (1891). Marshall's Principles of Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 5 (3): 319-338. doi:10.2307/1879612
Wang, J., Wu, C., and Frank X. Zhang, (2008). Liquidity, default, taxes and yields on municipal bonds, Journal of Banking & Finance. 32, pp.1133-1149.
Watfe, G. (2015). The Impact of the ECB's Asset Purchase Programmes on Sovereign Bond Spreads in the Euro Area. Bruges European Economic Research Papers, (35).
Wei, B., Yue, W.Z. (2020). Liquidity backstops and dynamic debt runs, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 116 (2020) 103916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103916
Wei, Xiaoyun, and Liyan Han. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on transmission of monetary policy to financial markets. International Review of Financial Analysis 74:101705, ISSN 1057-5219. https://doi.org/10.1016/jMa.2021.101705.
Weitzman ML., (1991). Price Distortion and Shortage Deformation or What Happened to the Soap?. American Economic Review. 81 (3) :401-414.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817-38.
Woodford, M. (2012). Methods of Policy Accommodation at the Interest-rate Lower Bound. Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, 185-288.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2009). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 4th Edition. SouthWestern College Publ.
Wu, C., and Yoo, W., (2016). Liquidity, Taxes and Yield Spreads between Tax-exempt and Taxable Bonds, The Journal of Finance, 37, pp.1141-1150.
Xiao-Wan Jiang, (2019). The Impact of Government Intervention on Municipal Bond Liquidity Premium: Evidence from China, Applied Economics and Finance, 6 (3), pp.79-86
Yildirim, Zekeriya, and Mehmet Ivrendi. (2021). Spillovers of US unconventional monetary policy: Quantitative easing, spreads, and international financial markets. Financial Innovation 7: 86. https://doi .org/10.1186/s40854-021 -00299-1.
Yu, E. (2016). Did Quantitative Easing Work? Economic Insights, 1(1), 5-13.
Zaghini, A. (2019). The CSPP at work: Yield heterogeneity and the portfolio rebalancing channel. Journal of corporate finance, 56, 282-297.
Zaremba, A., Kizys, R., & Aharon, D. Y. (2021). Volatility in International Sovereign Bond Markets: The role of government policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Finance Research Letters, 43(100), S1544612321000921.
Zellner, Arnold. (1962). An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 348-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664.
Zellner, Arnold, and Henry Theil. (1962). Three-Stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations. Econometrica 30: 54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911287.
Обратите внимание, представленные выше научные тексты размещены для ознакомления и получены посредством распознавания оригинальных текстов диссертаций (OCR). В связи с чем, в них могут содержаться ошибки, связанные с несовершенством алгоритмов распознавания. В PDF файлах диссертаций и авторефератов, которые мы доставляем, подобных ошибок нет.